கேள்விகள் லேபிளுடன் இடுகைகளைக் காண்பிக்கிறது. அனைத்து இடுகைகளையும் காண்பி
கேள்விகள் லேபிளுடன் இடுகைகளைக் காண்பிக்கிறது. அனைத்து இடுகைகளையும் காண்பி

திங்கள், 20 நவம்பர், 2017

25. பதிவுலகில் ஒரு குழாயடிச் சண்டை.

பதிவுலகம் சுவையற்றுப் போயிற்று என்று பலரும் கூறுகிறார்கள். அவர்கள் இப்போது வரும் பதிவுகளைப் படிப்பது இல்லை என்று தெரிகிறது. எனது இதற்கு முந்தின பதிவில் வந்திருக்கும் பின்னூட்டங்களைப் படித்து விட்டு பதிவுலகம் சுவையாக இருக்கிறதா இல்லையா என்று தெரிந்து கொள்ளுங்கள்.

http://swamysmusings.blogspot.com/2017/11/24.html

பெயரில்லாஞாயிறு, 19 நவம்பர், 2017 ’அன்று’ முற்பகல் 11:28:00 IST
Please show proof from science You'r making statements in public forum which reach so many Therefore it's your responsibility to add proofs
பதில்கள்


  1. Mr. Nameless,
    Please search the google for this topic. You will find hundreds of articles for and against the drinking of water during meals. Just remember they are all mostly from developed countries where salt intake is very very less than India, especially Tamilnadu.

    Another thing is if I suggest that suicide will end all your problems, will you commit it? Don't you have brain? Should you not analyse any information you come across for its relevance to you?

    Opinions expressed in blogs are only one's own perceptions and following them is at your own discretion.

    Why do you hide behind the "Nameless"? You are not traceable. It is total cowardice.
    நீக்கு
  2. Mr Kandasamy

    No it's not cowardice. Just because there's a facility in Google blogs, like in yours, for posting anonymously, readers use it to post comments. It cannot be called hiding ID cowardly as your blog posts are on ordinary matters of everyday life like eating and sleeping and my comments thereon are decently worded. There's no secret sharing of information or like that. Why shouldn't comments be anything - with ID or w/o it? Your blog is open to all to read and post.

    Different readers may have different reasons for posting anonymously. My reason is that it is my comments, not my ID, which are relevant to you. My name is useless to you. Still you can put up a disclaimer that unanymous comments won't be entertained This will help me to know you are interested in the ID of your commentators and I'll definitely post with name.

    Now that you want to know, let me inform you that my name is Pa Vinayagam. I post my feedback comments in many blogs in that name; and sometimes, out of laziness, unanimously They're decently worded in English and in Tamil I have a blog in English https://throughalookingglassalaymanreflects.wordpress.com

    Next my comments on the contents of your message
  3. You are posting scientific information Whether to drink water with meal or not is a medical information But you have not adduced any basis for that If it is an ordinary personal experience it is ok to write w/o any supporting evidence But it is a medical information Your argument is ''I'll post any medical information w/o any evidence and it's for readers to go and trace the evidence'' No one will accept that It's your responsibility to give that also

    Next you say readers should not lap up what's offered by you. In that case readers won't take you seriously. You are an old man with a lot of experiences in life and readers look upon you with confidence. You are saying in effect that they shouldn't take you seriously at all.

    If I go to google for such information, why should I come to you?

    Pa Vinayagam
    https://throughalookingglassalaymanreflects.wordpress.com
  4. தமிழ்மணத்தில் ''மறுமொழியாளர்கள்எ'' என்ற பகுதியைத் திறந்து என் பெயரையும் நான் போட்ட மறுமொழிகளையும் பார்க்கலாம்.

    Pa Vinayagam
    https://throughalookingglassalaymanreflects.wordpress.com
    நீக்கு
  5. Mr. ......

    Blog is there to share personal experiences. It is not a scientific journal. For expressing personal experiences, I don't think that I have to quote references.

    Learning from others experience is one way of gaining knowledge. One need not blindly believe in other's experiences. It is only to stimulate one's thinking and not more than that.

    As I have already mentioned that if I say suicide is a panacea for all human problems and if somebody takes it literally, it is foolishness.

    Anyhow I am immensely thankful to you for having taken pains to answer my comments.

    Hope you are aware that such arguments should not be taken as personal affrontation and we should stop at that level.
    நீக்கு
  6. No I disagree. It may be your personal experiences but your blogpost gives medical information based on your experiences: digestion and what induces or prevents it. Perfect medical matter.

    All medical information is based on a variety of personal experiences of various people. To arrive at a medical discovery, physicians may examine 1000s of people. Sometimes on themselves also. (the theme of the famous novel Dr Jekyll and Mr Hide). Your doctor, in wanting to know what is ailing you and the reasons for that, asks you first about your personal history: What have you eaten last? Have you had a sound sleep? etc.

    Whether readers may themselves go and examine the basis for your post or not is your guess or wish.

    You've known my name. Has it helped you in any way? Your name doesn't matter to me at all. If it is any other Samy, instead of Kandasamy, will the meaning of your words change? A rose by any other name will smell as sweet !

    Your age and your attitude are quite at variance. Usually people mellow with age but in your case, you are hardening with age. As we grow old, we grow to take men and matters philosophically and become more forgiving. Your are an octogenarian now. Even if you become a nonagenarian or centenarian, that life will be lonely with your faculties going down. Lets bid farewell to all - our loved ones and others - with a smile on our faces. It's too late to be a gentleman. Be quick and smile.

    Let not the world say: 'He left the name at which the world grew pale !'

    With these words (not mine, but Samuel Johnson's), bidding farewell to you. I'll never enter here.
    நீக்கு
  7. Dear Mr. ...
    You may disagree with many things I write about. But it is a known fact that when people have no valid points to argue, they resort to personal abuse. That is what you are doing now. I have no grievance against you for this because this is the normal human behaviour of which you are no exception.

    Wish you get the meaning of what I say.
  8. ஒரு டவுட் ,தண்ணி குடிக்கும் போது சாப்பிடலாமா?
    பதில்கள்


    1. இது எல்லாக் குடிமகன்களும் செய்வதுதானே. இதில் என்ன டவுட்?
  9. இந்தக் கடைசி கேள்வியும் பதிலும்தான் கிளைமாக்ஸ்.

  10. பின் தொடர்ச்சி - 
  11. I heard that it's bad to drink water (or other fluids) during meals. ... But if anything,drinking water helps your stomach liquefy food, which aids in digestion and nutrient absorption; it may also prevent constipation and bloating by softening stools and keeping your digestive tract lubricated.Jun 17, 2015
    I heard that it’s bad to drink water (or other fluids) during meals. Is that true?
    Actually, the opposite is true: It’s great to have a glass of water with you at the table. Some folks claim that consuming fluids with your food dilutes the bile and stomach acid needed to break down and absorb nutrients. But if anything, drinking water helps your stomach liquefy food, which aids in digestion and nutrient absorption; it may also prevent constipation and bloating by softening stools and keeping your digestive tract lubricated. Drinking H2O with your meals can also keep you from overeating. It helps fill you up faster and also encourages you to take breaks from your food, causing you to slow down and check in with your hunger signals.
    Health‘s medical editor, Roshini Rajapaksa, MD, is assistant professor of medicine at the NYU School of Medicine and co-founder of Tula Skincare.

    Drinking Water During Meals

    by Veronica
    (Hartford, Connecticut)
    Here I will answer the question asked by Veronica, "Why can't you drink water while you eat food?" Though doctors can recommend that there is nothing wrong with drinking water during meals. As per yogic/ ayurvedic philosophy you must drink lot of water throughout the day, but avoid drinking water during meals. The stomach must not be heavily loaded. Half of the stomach should be filled with solid food, one fourth with watery portion and leave one fourth empty.

    Also, keep in mind that fruits and vegetables itself contain large amount of water. It is recommended to drink minimal amount of water half an hour prior to eating meals and two hours after meals.

    But there cannot be a hard and fast rule for drinking water. You may have to drink water if you are having meals after a hard day of work in hot and dry climate. The amount of water you drink depend on weather conditions and your physical activity levels. Also, the amount of water required will depend on type of food you are eating. If food is sattvik and consisting mostly of fruits and vegetables, water requirement will be minimal. Whereas for spicy Tamsik diet, water requirement will be more and you cannot avoid water with meals. 

    Also, remember that efficiency of digestion does not depend solely on the amount of water taken with meals. Take into account nutrition levels of your diet, lifestyle, stress levels and eating habits while analysing your digestion. 

    Water During Meals
    1. Avoid drinking water with your meals. Drinking water with your meals dilutes the gastric juice and slows down the process of digestion in the stomach and intestines. Even if you need to drink water just sip water kept at room temperature. Ideally, Ayurvedic texts recommend sipping minimal amount of plain warm water during meals. 

    2. Cold water during the meals reduces the digestive fire. Digestive enzymes become inactive, digestive process is hampered and leads to accumulation of toxic waste in the body. Hence drinking of iced water, soft drinks, sodas, tea or coffee or alcohol is strictly prohibited. 

    3. Chew your food properly and it will easily pass down to your stomach. Do not drink water to swallow food in a hurry. If required drink water after swallowing food.

        

திங்கள், 24 செப்டம்பர், 2012

கடவுள் செய்யும் அக்கிரமம்




மனிதன் பிறக்கும்போது எல்லோரும் சமம் என்று சொல்கிறார்கள். ஆனால் ஒருவன் பணக்காரனாகிறான், இன்னொருவன் பிச்சைக்காரனாக இருக்கிறான். கடவுள் ஏன் இந்த பட்சபாதம் காண்பிக்கிறார்? இது காலம் காலமாக கேட்கப்பட்டு வரும் கேள்வி.

ஆன்மீகவாதிகள் சொல்லும் வியாக்யானம் என்னவென்றால் அவரவர்கள் பூர்வஜன்ம கர்ம பலன்களின்படி இவ்வுலக வாழ்க்கை அமைகிறது என்கிறார்கள். அப்போது மறு ஜன்மம் உண்டு என்று ஊர்ஜிதமாகிறது. இந்தக் கொள்கையை ஆதரிப்பவர்கள் மேலும் சொல்வதாவது. போன ஜன்மாவில் பாவகாரியங்கள் செய்ததால்தான் உனக்கு இந்த ஜன்மாவில் இவ்வாறு துன்பங்கள் வந்துள்ளன. இந்த ஜன்மாவில் நீ நல்ல காரியங்கள் செய்வாயாகில் அடுத்த ஜன்மாவில் நீ சுகப்படுவாய் என்று கூறுகிறார்கள்.

இந்த தத்துவத்தை ஏற்றுக்கொள்வதில் ஒரே ஒரு தயக்கம், இப்பூவுலகில் பிறந்த எவருக்குமே தங்களுடைய பூர்வ ஜன்ம ஞாபகம் அணுவளவு கூட இருப்பதில்லை. அப்படி இருக்கையில் இந்த பூர்வ ஜன்மம், கர்ம வினை இவைகளை எப்படி நம்ப முடியும்? என்று யாராவது கேட்டால், சாஸ்திரம் சொல்லுகிறது, ஆகையால் நீ நம்ப வேண்டும் என்கிறார்கள்

சாஸ்திரங்கள் ஆகாயத்திலிருந்தா விழுந்தது? அதுவும் நம்மைப்போன்ற மனிதன் எழுதியதுதானே? இப்படிக்கேட்டால் நீ நாத்திகன், நீ நாசமாய்ப்போவாய் என்று சாபம் கொடுக்கிறார்கள்.

நான் நினைக்கிறேன். மனிதனின் ஏற்றத் தாழ்வுகளை நியாயப் படுத்த அல்லது அவைகளை நினைத்து மனிதன் துவண்டு போகாமலிருக்க கொஞ்சம் புத்திசாலி மனிதன் கண்டுபிடித்த யுக்திதான் இது. காலம் காலமாய் சொல்லி வந்ததினால், பலர் அதை உண்மை என்றே நம்புகிறார்கள். இன்னும் நூறு ஆண்டுகள் கழித்து எம்.ஜி.ஆர். என்று ஒரு சித்தர் இருந்தார் என்றால் அன்றிருப்பவன் எல்லாம் நம்பினாலும் நம்புவார்கள்.

கர்ம வினை, மறுஜன்மம், புண்ணியம், பாவம் என்பதெல்லாம் வெறும் நம்பிக்கைகள்தான். ஒருவனுடைய நம்பிக்கைகள்தான் அவனை ஆத்திகனாகவோ நாத்திகனாகவோ அடையாளம் காட்டுகின்றன. உண்மை எது என்று யாரால் சொல்ல முடியும்?